|
From Brown to Greens
Redevelopment of Landfills Has
Its Share of Traps
Turning closed landfills into golf courses presents legal
technical and environmental challenges. If you're in the
niche market or seeking to enter, these tips and guidelines
could be extremely useful.
There's a trend throughout the United States these days to
reclaim real estate formerly occupied by municipal and other
types of landfills and then convert it into golf courses.
Stakeholders in this wave of development need to be aware
of the legal and technical challenges that they may encounter.
Two prominent examples of reclamation projects include the
redevelopment of a superfund site a short boat ride from New
York City into a world-class golf club, and the Coyote Canyon
Landfill in Newport Beach, which will be converted to an upscale
golf course.
The 300-acre Coyote Canyon Landfill operated as a solid-waste
disposal facility for nearly 40 years. It was used for the
disposal of approximately 60 million cu. yds. of non-hazardous
and inert refuse. The Class 3 Solid Waste Sanitary Landfill
was closed for general use in 1990.
Regulatory programs are changing to offer both opportunities
and new challenges for converting old landfills into productive
real estate developments.
Legal Concerns
Redeveloping landfills into golf courses or other productive
end uses can provide excellent potential commercial and/or
community benefits, but there are issues.
Legally, several concerns must be addressed. Liability concerns
regarding potential environmental claims under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA,
or Superfund) can dissuade private developers and their lenders.
Changes to CERCLA in 2002 offer some liability protection
for those who can qualify as bona fide prospective purchasers
of property where historical releases of hazardous substances
may have occurred. Under Section 222 of the Small Business
Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act, a bona
fide prospective purchaser can receive liability protections
if the following specific conditions are met:
- Purchaser made "all appropriate inquiry" into
past uses of the site
- Purchaser complies with any duties to report what is
discovered and cooperates with the authorities
- Purchaser complies with deed restrictions and controls,
such as maintaining or improving landfill cap
- Purchaser exercises appropriate care regarding the site,
including taking reasonable steps to limit threats to human
health and the environment
- A prospective purchaser of a closed landfill site probably
can meet these conditions, provided they are prepared to
meet the technical challenges of landfill redevelopment,
including providing for mitigating methane gas hazards and
providing for proper foundations.
Technical Issues
As it ages, municipal solid waste in a landfill decomposes
and consolidates. Active settlement can take place for many
years, depending upon the depth of the trash fill, the types
of wastes present and the method of placement.
Before buildings or other improvements can be constructed
on a landfill site, estimates of expected settlement must
be made based upon experience, empirical settlement observations
and numerical models.
Heavy loads will surcharge the waste mass and accelerate
consolidation and settlement. Many site operators stockpile
cover soils or excess waste, on portions of the landfill prior
to final closure. Such operating practices should be identified
and considered when estimating settlement and differential
settlement rates.
Although some buildings have been constructed using floating
foundations (normally after replacing a few feet of the underlying
trash with structural fill), most larger buildings and sensitive
structures constructed over landfills utilize deep foundations
such as piles or caissons. A combination of the two approaches
has been used over old shallow landfills, in which building
walls are constructed on piles or caissons, while a floating
slab is used for the building floor.
The result often is a stable building, surrounded by a settling
ground surface as the underlying landfill consolidates. At
one California landfill, a hinged slab was connected to a
retail building on one side, and allowed to "float"
with the land surface on the other side. If settlement causes
the slab to sink too far on the floating side, it can be jacked
up and the land surface re-graded to create a proper entranceway
to the building.
Allowances must be made for differential settlement where
utilities enter natural ground or fixed structures supported
on deep foundations. Flexible utility connections have been
developed for such applications. Pipe-runs beneath buildings
constructed on deep foundations should be hung from the overlying
structural concrete slabs with non-corrosive hangers and surrounded
by non-cohesive backfill material. If not, settlement of the
underlying fill could cause the pipe to be pulled away from
the building.
Incorporating Protective Measures
As solid waste decomposes, landfill gas, consisting primarily
of methane and carbon dioxide, is produced. If allowed to
accumulate within a confined area in the presence of an ignition
source, methane can explode or present a fire hazard. Any
improvements constructed on or near a landfill should incorporate
appropriate LFG protection measures.
Several approaches are available to protect structures from
LFG. Active control technologies include LFG extraction to
remove the gas before it reaches structures, and air injection
or air-curtain systems to create positive pressures, driving
LFG away from structures.
Passive control technologies include use of membrane barriers
and vents to prevent LFG from entering structures and monitoring
and alarm systems to warn of accumulating LFG. Passive systems
are commonly used where the landfill is old, and most of the
decomposition has occurred.
Passive systems also may be appropriate where the building
will have limited usage, or is of open construction, such
as parking structures.
LFG control systems protecting higher occupancy buildings
often have such redundant systems as barriers, active extraction,
and monitoring alarms, especially when the landfill is not
old. Special care must be taken where utilities or other site
features penetrate barrier systems; LFG will follow preferential
flow paths along utility trenches and enter buildings at points
of penetration unless properly sealed.
LFG protection systems require proper operation, monitoring,
and maintenance. Monitoring alarm sensors can become "poisoned"
by LFG constituents and rendered useless. LFG condensate and
corrosive gas constituents can affect mechanical systems.
As the closed landfill ages, LFG production patterns change,
requiring adjustments in extraction system operation.
Case Study: Industry Hills
The Industry Hills Recreation and Conference Center is located
on the same development as two of Southern California's most
challenging golf courses. The development, located near La
Puente, approximately 20 mi. east of downtown Los Angeles,
also contains a conference center, Olympic-sized swimming
pool, tennis complex, equestrian center, laundry facility
and 11-story hotel. The 617-acre site includes 155 acres formerly
used for sanitary landfill purposes between 1951 and 1969.
About 3.6 million tons of municipal waste were deposited into
the landfill, which has an average refuse fill depth of approximately
35 ft.
The LFG management facilities at the project consist of two
main systems, with the initial installation in February 1974.
The first system prevents the accumulation of methane gas
beneath on-site structures, and migration beyond property
lines. Migrating LFG is collected and then destroyed at a
blower/flare station capable of burning 500 cfm of LFG.
The second gas control system was designed for LFG energy
recovery. While this system aids in LFG migration and surface
emission control, it also supplies medium Btu fuel for convention
center boilers and water heaters for the Olympic-size pool
and laundry complex. The LFG process facility compresses and
cools the gas to remove free liquids, and is capable of supplying
approximately 2,100 MM Btu fuel each month. This saves the
city of Industry approximately $10,000 to $15,000 each month
in displacing natural gas demands.
Operation and maintenance of the gas system is regulated
by strict guidelines from a number of different state and
local enforcement agencies. In addition to these strict guidelines,
the design engineers have developed numerous operating criteria
that present unique challenges to the facility's operators.
Some of the major challenges are health and safety; coordination
with numerous on-site personnel such as security guards and
ground maintenance crews; odor control; and maintenance repair
and access.
Evidence of the success of Industry Hills Recreation and
Conference Center is apparent--the project has received two
prestigious awards.
The facility was awarded the "ASCE Outstanding Civil
Engineering Achievement Award" in 1981. In 1997, it received
the "Solid Waste Association of North America Gold Award
for Landfill Gas Projects."
The Future of "Greens" Redevelopment
The challenges inherent in redevelopment of a closed landfill
are substantial. However, experience has shown that the technical
challenges of long-term and differential settlement, unstable
foundation conditions, LFG control and protection and health
and safety issues, are solvable in most cases. On the other
hand, legal liability challenges continue to present impediments
to landfill redevelopment.
Recent brownfield policy initiatives at the federal and state
levels, coupled with increasing experience on the part of
national lending institutions, suggest that such impediments
also can be overcome. With the proper planning mechanisms
and resources in place, the redevelopment of brownfields into
"greens" can continue to be successful.
McLaughlin, P.E., and Gardner,
P.E., DEE, are senior vice presidents with Long Beach-based
SCS Engineers, an engineering, environmental consulting and
construction company.
|