|
How Close is Congestion Relief?
New Initiatives May Increase Funding
Options
Public/private partnerships in some states have jump-started
a project's preliminary engineering phase. Meanwhile, three
bills pending in the California Legislature may offer a
way for the state to increase the number of sources of transportation
funding.
By Linda Bohlinger and Jack Finn
California's severe budget crisis, coupled with the delay
of the massive federal highway appropriations bill now winding
its way through committee, will require innovative funding
ideas to keep projects moving. But thanks to an innovative
way of building and financing highways and other infrastructure,
relief for some California motorists might arrive sooner than
expected.
Even with the federal transportation reauthorization bill,
TEA-LU, moving through Congress, public agencies realize they
can't count on federal monies to initiate projects or for
continued cash flow. TEA-LU, which earmarks $284 billion for
highways over the next six years, remained idle for 18 months
because of ideological differences over increasing gas taxes
by 5 cents a gallon. After several extensions, the bill finally
passed the U.S. House of Representatives on March 10 and moved
to the Senate.
The Value of Public- and Private-Sector
Opportunities
Partnering with a public entity is becoming one of the most
common and effective ways of getting projects off the ground.
One good example is a funding strategy that HNTB's management
consulting group Bohlinger engineered for the Gerald Desmond
Bridge Replacement Project in Long Beach.
The Port of Long Beach expected federal discretionary monies--which
have not yet arrived due to the delay in the federal reauthorization
bill--to supplement its own funds to conduct environmental
documentation and preliminary engineering. As part of a larger
strategic funding plan, HNTB's management consulting team
worked with the port to identify $10 million in Caltrans'
Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. The
HBRR Program was created in the Surface Transportation Assistance
Act of 1978 and replaced the Special Bridge Replacement Program
in the Federal--aid Highway Act of 1970. This grant allowed
the port to continue preliminary work.
While California has been a trendsetter in transportation
issues, states like Texas and Virginia are racing ahead by
utilizing public-private partnerships.
Projects such as the Trans-Texas Corridor and the Virginia
Dulles Rail Corridor, which use private equity or at-risk
dollars, will be completed faster than using conventional
transportation funding methods.
States such as Georgia, Texas and Virgina offer public/private
partnerships whereby firms can submit bids for projects. The
private firms must invest some at-risk money, but in many
cases this jumpstarts a project's preliminary engineering
phase, while awaiting funds for the design/build phase.
Even with the opportunity for private funding, it's critical
to have a full financial strategy. A plan helps you strategize
all the ways you can secure financing throughout the life
of a project. Building the plan itself does not guarantee
you'll get funding, but it will ensure you'll be more competitive
at securing funding at all levels.
Pending Legislation Under "GoCalifornia"
Three pending bills in the California Legislature, part of
Gov. Arnold Scwarzenegger's "GoCalifornia" program,
may offer a way for California to catch up to other states
and increase the sources of transportation funding. One measure,
AB 850, stands out in particular. It deals with tolling and
public-private partnerships. And two others are designed to
cut red tape for transportation projects once funding is secured.
- AB 850 (Joe Canciamilla, D-Pittsburg) implements innovative
financing, including public-private partnerships and high-occupancy
toll lanes, to pay for building and maintaining California's
roads and highways.
- SB 705 (George Runner, R-Antelope Valley) gives Caltrans
the ability to use design/build, a streamlined building
process that shortens project delivery.
- AB 1266 (Roger Niello, R-Fair Oaks) enables Caltrans
to use design/sequencing by allowing construction to begin
as soon as the design is finished for each phase of a project.
An Argument for Toll Roads
There is little doubt that accepting tolls where they do
not currently exist will require a huge shift in the collective
consciousness of California commuters.
While looking into the idea of placing electronic tolls on
Interstate 15, the San Diego Association of Governments conducted
a survey in 2002 and found 94 percent of transit riders and
92 percent of carpoolers asked would support Express Lanes,
such as those on State Route 91 in eastern Orange County.
Today's funding realities in California are these: traditional
federal and state financing for road projects clearly is insufficient.
Political leaders are reluctant to hike the gasoline tax to
pay for highways and bridges. And, to ease the state's financial
crisis, both former Gov. Gray Davis and Arnold Schwarzenegger
have transferred more than $3 billion in transportation funds
under Proposition 42, approved by voters in 2002. These facts
alone mean AB 850 might appeal to lawmakers in Sacramento,
especially where tolling is concerned.
Advances in electronic-toll collection over the past decade
and growing frustration with congested commutes have made
this sensitive funding solution a bit safer to handle.
Toll roads in the United States might lag behind Europe in
terms of technological advancement, but transportation planners
in many states are considered leaders in finding creative
ways to make the most of the current system.
Several state agencies have taken advantage of unused capacity
in high-occupancy vehicle lanes, with the high-occupancy toll-lane
concept. HOT lanes such as those initially designed by HNTB
on SR 91 in eastern Orange County offer single-occupant vehicles
a choice.
Market research by the Reason Foundation, a libertarian think
tank, indicates that individuals of all income levels use
the lanes. Statistics from San Diego and Orange counties'
toll lanes show that most drivers are middle-income commuters
who only use the lanes a few times a week. The Orange County
Transportation Authority found that typical 91 express lane
users are working commuters in their late 30s or early 40s,
married and with children.
Plus, drivers who use the lanes every day are helping the
rest of us by paying a considerable amount of the cost of
much-needed public infrastructure that would otherwise not
get built. Those are the same drivers who open up space in
free lanes for non-paid users, so everyone benefits.
Bohlinger is vice president and
director of national management consulting for HNTB Corp.
Finn is an HNTB Corp. senior vice president with 25 years
engineering experience in tolling technology.
|