|
A Concrete Lining
A 35-Mi. Stretch of the Coachella
Canal Gets a Needed Upgrade
By Greg Aragon
The last unpaved miles of the 122-mi.-long Coachella Canal
are being replaced by a new concrete-lined canal. The new
$90 million waterway is projected to save about 26,000 acre
ft (about 8.5 billion gallons) of Colorado River water that
is currently lost annually due to canal seepage.
The
state-funded project, designed and engineered by Montgomery
Watson Harza, along with Bookman Edmonston, both of Sacramento,
should be completed by the end of December, when water is
expected to be transferred to the new canal.
Earthwork is about 99 percent complete on the 35-mi. section
and crews are now mainly working on fencing, landscaping and
environmental work.
One of the most unique aspects of the job is that it is being
built right next to the old canal, in the same, roughly 200-ft.-wide
right-of-way.
"The two canals, from centerline to centerline, are
only about 50 ft. apart," said Dan Charlton, senior irrigation
engineer for Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD), owners
of the canal. "So we had to be very careful [of seepage]
because there is no lining on the bottom of the existing canal."
He said that to make sure that water from the old channel
didn't leak into the new one, the bottom of the new canal
was built on higher ground.
Wayne Dahl, project manager and engineer of record for Bookman
Edmonston, said building a new "parallel canal"
next to the old one was not the water district's first plan.
"Originally the [old] canal was going to be lined in
place with pipelined bypasses going around," he added.
"But the risky part was that the bypasses had to go across
[mountain] washes and there was no way to protect them."
Because of this, he said a parallel canal was built. "Even
though there can be three or four years where the washes never
flow, rain would have been a disaster," Dahl added.
He said the new canal "absolutely mirrors" the
old one.
To protect the new canal from rainwater runoff, crews are
building 25 new siphon stations. These bridge-like structures,
which range from 200 ft. to 800 ft. long, direct the canal
underneath the ground in places where the washes travel above.
Dahl said another reason the engineering team decided upon
the parallel method was that it turned out to cost about $30
million less than lining the canal in place.
The lining project is located between the Salton Sea and
the Chocolate Mountains, about 50 miles from the Mexican Border
near Highway 111. Construction began in October of 2004, in
the town Niland and is moving north toward Mecca, at the western
end of the Salton Sea.
To get the channel laid will all that concrete, crews relied
on a well-organized "paving train" rolling down
the bed at a rate of about 2,000 ft. per day. The train consists
of a trimming machine, followed by the paver, a joint jumbo
machine, a finishing machine and lastly, a curing machine.
When
an unusually hot summer hit the California desert area in
June, the project team switched to laying the concrete at
night.
Crews are also currently installing a 29-mi.-long, 8-ft.-high
wildlife fence to keep out deer and bighorn sheep, as well
as digging 36 ponds for the animals to drink from.
When the Coachella Canal was completed in 1949, only its
northernmost 37 miles were lined with concrete.
In 1980, the CVWD decided to replace the southernmost 49
mi. of the earthen canal with a parallel, concrete-lined waterway,
an act which saved more than 130,000 acre ft. of water annually.
This is the section where the canal branches off of the All-American
Canal in Imperial County.
The remaining 35 mi. of still-earthen canal, which are currently
being replaced, flow above soil with a high concentration
of clay, which yields less seepage. But as Colorado River
water becomes more precious, the CVWD decided to finish the
job and build a new concrete canal.
To do this, it had to prepare 160,000 yds. of concrete and
move 5.6 million cu.-yds. of earth.
"Getting all the dirt moved is a big challenge,"
said Shawn Otheim, project manager for Alamo-based R&L
Brosamer, the general contractor. "It's not a typical
situation. You have an existing canal on one side of you,
and on the other side the spoils from when they dug the existing
canal, so there are a lot of holes and hills. And it matters
where you put every grain of dirt."
|