Features
 Current Features
 Past Features




Feature Story - July 2007
"Change (the Way We Build)"

Integrated Project Delivery, BIM
Use Highlight 'Change' Conference

By Robert Carlsen

In an aptly titled first-ever "change" conference in San Francisco recently, architects, owners, public officials and contractors were all warned, early and often, that the traditional method of constructing buildings, most notably the design-bid-build way, is no longer applicable in today's environment and everyone needs to change their ways.


advertisement

Hosted by the American Institute of Architects, California Council, and McGraw-Hill Construction, the two-day "Change (the Way We Build)" conference at the University of California, San Francisco's Mission Bay Community Center focused on Integrated Project Delivery and the inefficiencies that impact all participants in the design and construction marketplace.

Integrated Project Delivery is the general term applied to a new project delivery system that utilizes highly collaborative, cross functional teams composed of all project lifecycle stakeholders including the owner, architect, general contractor, engineers, suppliers and security.

Panelists at the conference stressed the need to have the team assembled early in the process, that all team members have open and equal access to information, and that they share equally in the risks and rewards of a given project.

"Teams make better decisions than individuals," says panelist Stuart Eckblad, AIA, director of design and construction at the UCSF Medical Center. The key, he adds, is to change relationships from the traditional adversarial way to more collaboration.

"IPD requires a level of comfort for all the parties involved," Eckblad says.

"There has to be a mutual respect, enhanced communication and clearly defined, open standards."

Building Information Modeling software - regardless of the vendor - is a key component of the IPD method, panelists say, but it is a tool, not the answer.

"Simulation is the key," says Kimon Onuma, AIA, president and director of technology at Onuma Inc. of Pasadena. "If you're not in BIM today, your relevancy is already suffering."

Though no one outright endorsed a particular BIM software, Onuma says that architects need to let vendors know that they need to communicate with other software.

Some highlights of the conference:

  • Michael Hricak, FAIA, principal at Michael Hricak & Associates, a Venice-based architectural firm, set the conference off on a good start with the quote: "The fittest may survive, but the most cooperative succeed," in response to a hypothetical question about survival in the design/construction industry of the 21st century.

  • George Hurley, project executive for Redwood City-based DPR Construction Inc., says that IPD benefits from openness and relationships. "In a recent project, we used the 'big room' concept - a doublewide trailer as our headquarters, and all the principals were based there," he says. "Everyone got to know one another well, and it was this relationship that got everyone on the same page."

    Hurley also says that 3D modeling allows for more pre-fab on a project, which results in fewer RFIs, re-work and change orders.

  • Will Lichtig of the Sacramento-based law firm of McDonough, Holland & Allen PC, which developed the Lean Project Delivery model for Sutter Health, says that IPD is composed of "5 Big Ideas": collaborate, really collaborate; increase relatedness; establish networks of commitment; optimize the whole; and tightly couple learning with action. "Really, this is an all for one, one for all concept," he adds.

  • Stephen Jones, McGraw-Hill Construction's leader on BIM, IPD and other issues, says that the current state of "inoperability" of BIM tools is a major problem, but that he says he feels the market will drive demand for a change.

    With research findings by a Harris Survey, plus data from such entities as the buildingSmart Alliance of the National Institute of Building Sciences, Jones says that construction nationwide is a $3 trillion industry and that 30 percent of that figure goes to waste. "We really have to change our overall culture and focus on the lifecycle of buildings while being friends of the earth," he says.



    Click here for next Feature Story >>

  • Click here for more Features >>



     


    Sponsors

    © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
    All Rights Reserved