|
'Protect Prop. 42' Rally Held at State
Capitol
At a rally at the State Capitol today, representatives
for the Save Proposition 42 Coalition spoke about efforts
to permanently protect Prop. 42, which provided that the
sales tax on gasoline would go to transportation programs.
Speakers at the rally included Jim Earp, executive director
of the California Alliance for Jobs; Julia E. Greene, executive
director of the San Joaquin Council of Governments; Jay Hansenof
the Building and Construction Trades Council of California;
and Jim Wunderman, executive director of the Bay Area Council
Michael Lawson, executive director of Transportation California,
a collaboration of business, labor and government organizations
interested in promoting sound transportation policies, made
the following comments at the rally.
After several years of siphoning off highway and transit
dollars to the general fund, there's nothing left in the tank
for even much-needed safety and basic maintenance projects.
Transportation programs are stalling out statewide. The CTC
has made no new STIP allocations since December 2002. Gas
taxes are not keeping up with the demand being exerted on
our state's transportation system.
According to the Legislative Analyst's Office, because gasoline
taxes have not increased since the mid-1990s, inflation-adjusted
gas tax revenues are projected to decline 8 percent from 1998-99
through 2004-05. Over the same period, vehicle miles traveled
are projected to increase by more than 15 percent.
What that says to me is that we should be putting more money
into our transportation system, not taking it out. Transportation
has already been cut to the bone, and now were looking at
cutting into the bone.
Another Prop. 42 suspension would almost surely result in
projects being dropped from the STIP, major job losses and
a negative impact on the state's economy. In fact, if Prop
42 is suspended yet again in this next budget cycle, many
projects statewide will be axed, and lost with those projects
will be critically needed economic activity and jobs.
Clearly, the quality of life in our great state will continue
to diminish with every dollar that does not get invested in
viable transportation projects, projects that ease congestion,
enhance mobility, improve safety and air quality, and create
jobs and drive California's economic engine.
According to study released earlier this year by the California
Business Roundtable, for every state dollar spent on transportation
projects, the state would see an additional $0.97 in indirect
and induced spending in the economy-many of these transactions
result in sales tax revenues and additional income for taxpayers
in the state, creating more revenue not only for the state
but local governments as well.
Moreover, every $1 billion of transportation spending in
California creates more than 18,000 new construction jobs
in the state.
Gov. Schwarzenegger has talked about "bringing the gold
back to California" and has just returned from a trip
to Japan to talk about trade. I applaud the governor's efforts
to attract trade. Hopefully, the governor and the Legislature
also recognize that any efforts to attract more trade compounds
the critical goods movement issues we have at the Ports of
Los Angeles and Long Beach and the Port of Oakland, as well.
While goods may not be moving, businesses are. Among the
top reasons cited by those leaving the state is the lack of
an effective and efficient transportation system. A system
that was once the envy of the world, now can only infamously
lay claim to having six of the top ten bumpiest urban roadway
systems in the United States.
Our coalition is focused on two priorities: Opposing diversion
of Prop. 42 funds in the 2005-06 state budget and getting
constitutional firewalls on the ballot to protect against
open-ended raids on gasoline sales tax revenues in the future.
You and others can play an important role by speaking out
and expressing your concerns to the governor and the Legislature.
|